Family Therapy Model Essay

Family therapy instances of psych another(prenominal)apy can be divided into collar classificationsa diachronic, historical, and experiential (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3). The ahistorical classification includes structural family therapy, strategic family therapy, behavioral family therapy, psychoeducational family therapy, and conference regulates (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3). The historical classification includes objective relations possible action and Bowen systems theory (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3).The experiential classification contains solo 1 modelthe experiential family therapy model (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3). While the historical models focus on changing the familys patterns of interaction as a means of removing the presenting problems, the historical models atomic number 18 rooted in psychoanalysis, with a long-acting therapy intervention in which the therapist is less(prenominal) involved than in the other classifications (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3).existential models, on the other hand, argon to a greater extent concerned with the patients growth, a process of both experiencing and monitoring congenital problems, and the patients self-identity development indoors the family context (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3).The history of the models and the therapists role in each differs, so given the size limitations of this paper, a correct history on each is non feasible. Each theory has its own major contributors. Among the ahistorical models, structural family theory, for example, was influenced by Gregory Bateson, who cogitate on verbal and nonverbal discourse the Palo Alto Team, which developed the concept of family homeostasis and Salvador Minuchin, who proverb families as functioning to socialize children and assuage the mutual live on of married couples, throe problems when boundaries were either too porous or too rigid (Werner-Wilson, n.d., pp. 2-4).Of the historical models, object relations theory was influence d by Melanie Klein and subsequent by Otto Kernberg, who focused on drives and the integration of Freudian and non-Freudian objectrelations theory, on an individual basis (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 3 Tribich, 1981, p. 27). In the experiential model, Whitaker redefined symptoms as attempts at growth and used simulate to offer fantasy alternatives to actual stressors (Griffin & Greene, 1998, p. 12). triple of the five key concepts of family therapy models are body forth in Schutzs Fundamental social Relationship Orientation, or FIRO modelinclusion, control, and pump (Hafner & Ross, 1989, p. 974).Parr (2000, p. 256) refers to the affection concept as experience when she states, The family FIRO model hypothesizes a paradigmatic gaze of the familys relationship organization close to the three interrelated core ineluctably of inclusion, control, and intimacy. Inclusion involves a feeling of belong within the family context, and it requires a sense of connectedness, a shared bel ief system, and an organized social organisation that the family incorporates to handle issues of roles and boundaries (Parr, 2000, p. 255).The concept of control involves the counseling the family interacts in terms of power and influence, as when these are used to resolve negate in the areas of discipline, role negotiations, and problem resolving power (Parr, 2000, p. 256). The affection or intimacy concept demonstrates the family members needs for interactions that allow them to be ease up with each other some their feelings and areas of photo (Parr, 2000, p. 256). Another key concept is conversation theory.There are varied types of communication theory, but the one that is most allot to family therapy is family communication patterns theory, which serves as a model of family communication based on relational connections among communication behaviors (Fitzpatrick, 2004, p. 175). Finally, the concept of net profits is an integral image of the family therapy approach. Net works provide support during family therapy when the family itself is under stress.As Goldenberg and Goldenberg (p. 12) point out, The support of a network of friends, extended family, clergy, neighbors, employers, and fellow employees and the availability of corporation resources often contribute to family recovery, and even chaotic, disorganized, abusive, and multi-problem families prolong resources. An evaluation of family therapy from the Christian perspective reveals that it is congruous with Christian principles.Because it is a mode of therapy predicated chiefly on understanding the dynamics of family heart and helpering family members to change their dysfunctional behavior, thither is little in family therapy thatruns at cross-purposes with Christian thinking. Inclusion, control, and affection are all Christian concepts as hearty. Everyone is included in the separate of those eligible to be Christians, and one lonesome(prenominal) needs to choose to belong. Control of ones actions is integral to the Christian perspective, with manifestations of a lack of control being regarded as problems.Affection is a hallmark of Christianity, and delivery boy displayed genuine affection to pile, urging his disciples to do the same. Communication theory is more than applicable to Christianity, as evidenced by the considerable amount of communication that takes place in the Bible and the many interactions that are record at that place to help believers understand both desirable and undesirable forms of communication. Moreover, Christianity is a community-oriented worship in many ways, urging believers to help those in need and to love others, so its precepts fit neatly into the concept of the support network, as well.Jesus traveled about the countryside, as did His disciples, taking help to people in various towns along the way, and there is a palpable sense of community in the Christian way of life, which considers other peoples feelings, welfare, and interests as well as ones own. Finally, there is in Christianity a strong family model, as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are fundamentally a divine family unit, and thus family therapy models are intrinsically structured to relate to the Christian model.ReferencesFitzpatrick, M.A. (2004). Family Communication Patterns Theory Observations on its using and Application. The Journal of Family Communication, 4(3/4), 167-179. EBSCO Host. Goldenberg, H., Goldenberg, I. (2007).Family Therapy An Overview. Florence, KY Brooks Cole. Griffin, W.A., Greene, S.M. (1998). Models of Family Therapy The Essential Guide. unfermented York Routledge. Hafner, R.J., Ross, M.W. (1989).The FIRO Model of Family Therapy Implications of Factor Analysis. Journal of clinical Psychology, 45(6), 974-979. Klein, M., Tribich, D. (1981). Kernbergs Object-Relations Theory A sarcastic Evaluation. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 62, 27-43. Retrieved on bound 25, 2010 from http//www.pep-web.org/ document.php?id=IJP.062.0027A Werner-Wilson, R.J. (n.d.). Family Therapy Theory. Retrieved on March 25, 2010 fromhttp//www.public.iastate.edu/hd_fs.511/lecture/Sourcebook20.ppt